🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a rising number of states are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". A law is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to approve a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," said the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures requiring guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various individuals to copy this path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, further states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this worldwide conversation continues, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments around the world are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.