🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.